Lorraine code, york university stuart firesteins book makes a provocative, if somewhat oblique, contribution to recent work on ignorance, for the line of thought is less clearly drawn between ignorance on one. The book then expand this basic idea of ignorance into six chapters that elaborate on why questions are more interesting and more important in science than facts, why facts are fundamentally unreliable based on our cognitive limits, why predictions are useless, and how to assess the quality of questions. How it drives science kindle edition by firestein, stuart. Firesteins writing often advocates for better science writing. The secret anarchy of science by michael brooks and ignorance. This strikes me as a particularly apt description of how science proceeds on a. How it drives science ignorance by stuart firestein ignorance investigates the strengths and weaknesses of the scientific method and reveals the importance of asking the right questions over the discovery of simple facts.
Why ignorance trumps knowledge in scientific pursuit. How it drives science, neuroscientist stuart firestein writes that science is often like looking for a. What does ignorance mean for creativity and for coming up with good ideas. Its basically a philosophy of science book designed for a mass audience, making the core and very valid point that science doesnt advance from knowledge and certainty, but from ignorance. Use features like bookmarks, note taking and highlighting while reading ignorance. Knowledge is a big subject, says stuart firestein, but ignorance is a bigger one. An experiment can prove fruitless because the facts dont exist. This is a classic case of a book that cries out to be. How it drives science in other words, scientists dont concentrate on what they know, which is considerable but also miniscule, but rather on what they dont know. Although in principle i would agree with the authors thesis that what drives science is not what we know but what we want to learn, i hated his writing so much. The interview, part of book tv s college series, was recorded in the kings college room in columbia university s. In other words, scientists dont concentrate on what they know, which is considerable but also miniscule, but rather on what they dont know.
Scientists have something of a reputation for being knowitalls. We may commonly think that we begin with ignorance and we gain knowledge but the more critical step in the process is the reverse of that. Jun 01, 2012 why ignorance trumps knowledge in scientific pursuit in ignorance. We invite you to join us on wednesday, november 14 at 6. How it drives science by stuart firestein is a short book. It is a case where data dont exist, or more commonly.
Firestein is our companion to the wide backstage of science, where what scientists dont know and sometimes. Argues that ignorance, not knowledge, is what drives science provides a fascinating insideview of the way everyday science is actually done features intriguing case histories of how individual scientists use ignorance to direct their research. In this witty talk, firestein gets to the heart of science as it is really practiced and suggests that we should value what we dont know or highquality ignorance just as much as what we know. Download it once and read it on your kindle device, pc, phones or tablets. Firestein at columbia university as part of our college series.
Scientists do reach after fact and reason, he asserts. How it drives science, in which stuart firestein sets out to debunk the popular idea that knowledge follows ignorance, demonstrating instead that its the other way around and, in the process, laying out a powerful manifesto for getting the public engaged with science a public to whom, as neil degrasse tyson recently reminded senate, the government is accountable in making. Firesteins ideas about how science works will strike most scientists as obvious. The importance of being ignorant january 28, 20 issue. And it is ignorancenot knowledgethat is the true engine of. Introduction it is very difficult to find a black cat in a dark room, warns an old proverb. Stuart firestein how ignorance drives science point of. Former fbi negotiator chris voss at the australia real estate conference duration. How it drives science, in which stuart firestein sets out to debunk the popular idea that knowledge follows ignorance, demonstrating instead that its the other way around and, in the process, laying out a powerful manifesto for getting the public engaged with science a public to. Ignorance, then, is what we do not know or understand yet. Sloan foundation program for the public understanding of science. Argues that ignorance, not knowledge, is what drives science.
Using reallife examples from history, ignorance shows that it is our awareness of what we dont know that drives scientific discovery. How it drives science, in which stuart firestein sets out to debunk the popular idea that knowledge follows ignorance, demonstrating instead that its the other way around and, in the process, laying out a powerful manifesto for getting the public engaged with science a public to whom, as neil degrasse tyson recently reminded senate, the government is accountable in making the very decisions that shape the course of science. Oct 27, 2019 ignorance, then, is what we do not know or understand yet. And it is ignorance not knowledge that is the true engine of science. The more complex the field, the higher the pedestal on which the scientists are placedor climb. How it drives science stuart firestein goes so far as to claim that ignorance is the main force driving scientific pursuit. It looks a lot less like the scientific method and a lot more like. Download for offline reading, highlight, bookmark or take notes while you read ignorance. And it is ignorancenot knowledgethat is the true engine of science. An idea ive explored previously in this space is how we come to know things how we come to know new things. Firestein writing is clear and gives compelling evidence for how ignorance drives science. Thoughtful ignorance firestein said most people believe ignorance precedes knowledge, but, in science, ignorance follows knowledge. Its a big black book no, its a small black book with a big question mark on the front of it. Our educational system is based upon this concept, where ignorance translates to poor performance.
In other words, science is based on ignorance, not knowledge. How it drives science, in which stuart firestein sets out to debunk the popular idea. The one big fact is that science traffics in ignorance, cultivates it, and is driven by it. Ignorance investigates the strengths and weaknesses of the scientific method and reveals the importance of asking the right questions over the discovery of simple facts. A corollary to the ignorance principle is that the results of research are not predictable. Firestein uses case studies in cognitive science, theoretical physics, astronomy, and neuroscience to demonstrate how ignorance is foundational to science. This example makes firesteins point wellthe research revealed our ignorance, but in a way that is tantalizing to the scientist who wants to know how memory really does work. May 22, 2012 stuart firestein teaches, of course, on the subject of ignorance at columbia university where hes chair of the department of biology. We must think about how ignorance works, and we have to be explicit about how to make it work to our advantage. Free radicals by michael brooks and ignorance by stuart. How ignorance fuels science and the evolution of knowledge. Sep 24, 20 in this witty talk, firestein gets to the heart of science as it is really practiced and suggests that we should value what we dont know or highquality ignorance just as much as what we.
The pedestal may then become a soapbox from which to proclaim what the scientist knows. In this course, we will examine the scientific approach to ignorance, though readings, discussions, and visits from working scientists who will discuss the state of ignorance in their field and in their individual laboratories. How it drives science, stuart firesteins delightful rumination on how science and scientists advance our. Most of us have a false impression of science as a surefire, deliberate, stepbystep method for finding things out and getting things done. How it drives science ignorance is defined as a lack of knowledge, understanding, or education a state which may sometimes be perceived as a weakness. Ignorance stuart firestein oxford university press. Thats the eloquently argued case at the heart of ignorance. Why ignorance trumps knowledge in scientific pursuit in ignorance. In this witty talk, firestein gets to the heart of science as it is really practiced and suggests that we should value what we dont know or highquality ignorance just as much as what we. How it drives science, firestein argues that human ignorance and uncertainty are valuable states of mind perhaps even necessary for the true progress of science.
Firestein, who chairs the biological sciences department at columbia university, teaches a course about how ignorance drives science. I enjoyed the 4 case studies of how ignorance drives science, which are based on scientists who gave lectures on four different science topics to his class on ignorance. Stuart firestein contrary to the popular view of science as a mountainous accumulation of facts and data, firestein takes the novel perspective that ignorance is the main product and driving force of science, and. Stuart firestein is the chair of columbia universitys department of biological sciences where he studies the vertebrate olfactory system, possibly the best chemical detector on the face of the planet. Firestein claims that exploring the unknown is the true engine of science, and says ignorance helps scientists concentrate their research. Firestein writes that conducting science is something like searching for a black cat in a dark room very difficult, especially when, as is often the case, it turns out there. The main character is asking the spiritual leader of the naavi clan why they havent been able to teach humans their ways. Firestein uses case studies in cognitive science, theoretical physics, astronomy. Questions are far more interesting than answers is the mantra of ignorance. How it drives science ebook written by stuart firestein. And as the books subtitle directs, this is what drives science. Jun 25, 2012 exploring this boundless frontier, neurobiologist stuart firestein explains how ignorance, rather than facts, drives science. I wish i could say it was also a sharp shock of a book, but not quite.
Mar 27, 2012 firestein writing is clear and gives compelling evidence for how ignorance drives science. These are the things of popular science programs like nature or discovery, and, while entertaining, they are not really about science, not the daytoday, nittygritty, at the office and bench kind of science. How it drives science, neuroscientist stuart firestein writes that science is often like looking for a black cat in a dark room. How it drives science by stuart firestein, propose another strategy. An international journal for theory, history and foundations of science 34 2. Jul 19, 2012 knowledge is a big subject, says stuart firestein, but ignorance is a bigger one.
The ignorant are unaware, unenlightened, uninformed. Most of us have a false impression of science as a surefire, deliberate, stepbystep. This is a lovely little book, which is truly about what drives science. How it drives science by stuart firestein goodreads. Apr 23, 2012 knowledge is a big subject, says stuart firestein, but ignorance is a bigger one. Firestein, a popular professor of neurobiology at columbia, admits at the outset that he uses the word ignorance at least in part to be intentionally provocative and clarifies that for him it denotes a communal gap in knowledge. Theres a wonderful scene in the hollywood blockbuster avatar which illustrates this. How it drives science, part 1 against knowitallism. It shows itself as a stubborn devotion to uninformed opinions, ignoring same root contrary ideas, opinions, or data. How it drives science, firestein argues that pursuing research based on what we dont know is more valuable than building on what we do know.